And it can be.

But the number itself tells us surprisingly little.

Fifteen years doing what?

Solving which problems?

In what context?

Which parts of that experience still matter?

And which parts could become useful somewhere completely different?

I started thinking about this when I had to look at my own career without the comfort of familiar job titles.

Years of experience are easy to count. Transferable value is much harder.

The labour market is changing quickly enough that this distinction matters. The World Economic Forum’s 2025 employer survey found that organisations expect 39% of workers’ core skills to change by 2030.

So time served cannot be the whole measure.

Experience has to survive context change.

A process improvement skill learned in finance may become useful in HR operations.

Managing teams across countries may translate into global workforce work.

A reconciliation project may reveal strengths in transformation, controls, stakeholder management and system design that travel far beyond reconciliation itself.

This is where I think experienced professionals sometimes undersell themselves.

We describe experience through the containers it happened in:

• the company.

• the department.

• the role.

• the industry.

But the market may care much more about what can be extracted from those containers.

What problems can you solve?
What complexity can you handle?
What decisions can you make?
What knowledge travels?
What have you learned that remains useful when the environment changes?

That is market value and it is not fixed.

A skill can become more valuable because technology changes. Another can lose value because the work around it disappears. A previously ordinary combination of skills can suddenly become unusual and useful. Which means experience is not something we simply accumulate.
It needs to be decoded, updated and re-positioned.

That is why I no longer think the strongest career question is: How many years of experience do I have?

I would rather ask: Which parts of what I know can create value somewhere I have not used them yet?

Fifteen years may then become worth much more than fifteen years.

Or much less.

The number was never the interesting part.

Related articles

Subscribe now

We write that we are strategic.
Analytical.
Good at solving problems.
Experienced in transformation.
Strong communicators.
And then we expect another person to decide whether those words are true.

I started thinking about this while working on my own professional repositioning.

After years of experience, I had plenty of things I could write on a CV. But writing them down did not automatically make their value visible. That is a different problem.

The shift towards skills-first hiring makes this increasingly relevant. LinkedIn has been documenting a move towards evaluating skills more directly rather than relying only on traditional proxies such as degrees, previous titles or years of experience.

But there is a second side to skills-first thinking that interests me even more:

If skills matter, how do we show them?

A project can show how you approached a problem.
A case study can show how you made a decision.
A work sample can show how you think.
A portfolio can reveal patterns across completely different roles.
Even a well-written article can demonstrate judgement, subject knowledge and the way you connect ideas.

Suddenly, professional visibility becomes much more tangible.

The CV still has a role. It gives context. But it does not have to carry all the evidence.
I think this becomes especially important for people whose value does not fit neatly into one predictable job title.

Career changers.
Generalists.
People moving internationally.
Experienced professionals trying to reposition what they already know.
Portfolio workers.

For them, simply listing the past can leave too much interpretation to the reader. So I have started asking a different question when looking at experience:
What evidence could make this visible?

Not everything needs a polished case study.
Sometimes one diagram is enough.
One before-and-after example.
One short explanation of a difficult decision.
One project that shows how you think.

Because the next stage of professional positioning may be less about making stronger claims and more about making fewer claims that need to be taken on trust.

More about Me & My Approach ⟶

Subscribe now

I knew who I was. I knew what I had worked on, what I was building now and how those pieces connected. The search results did not. That gap stayed with me.

For years, professional visibility meant making sure the right information existed somewhere online. A LinkedIn profile. A website. A few articles. Maybe a portfolio.

Now there is another layer.

Search engines, AI-assisted search and other systems increasingly try to interpret the information they can access and turn scattered signals into an answer.

And that changes the question.
It is no longer only: What can someone find about me?
It is also: What story can a system build from what it finds?

LinkedIn itself makes part of a public profile available to search engines depending on visibility settings, and describes the public profile as a simplified version of the full member profile. Google’s AI search features similarly work from web content that can be discovered and indexed; its guidance for appearing in these experiences starts with the same foundations as ordinary search.

That means fragmentation matters.

If your LinkedIn says one thing, your website says another and your published work points somewhere else entirely, a human may still understand the nuance.

A system may simply see unrelated pieces.

This made me rethink professional visibility.

I no longer see it as filling every platform with more information.

I see it as creating enough consistent evidence and context that the same person becomes recognizable across different places.

Your name.
Your areas of expertise.
The questions you keep returning to.
The projects you actually build.
The language you repeatedly use around your work.

Over time, those signals begin to form a pattern and perhaps that is the more useful goal. Not controlling exactly what the internet says about you. That is impossible, but making it increasingly difficult to misunderstand what you are about.

I think professional visibility is becoming less about being everywhere and more about leaving a coherent enough trail to be understood.

By people.

And now, increasingly, by systems too.

More about Me & My Approach ⟶

Subscribe now

You learn something. You get a job. You become better at it. You move to the next role. Then perhaps the next company, the next title, the next level.

For more than fifteen years, my own career looked reasonably close to that picture. I worked in a corporate environment, mainly across finance, operations and international teams. Roles changed. Responsibilities grew. New countries, systems and problems entered the picture.

There was a direction.

Then, at some point, the line became much harder to draw.

Today, I am interested in global workforce and cross-border work, future work models, career systems, technology, identity and new ways of living. Some of these areas connect easily. Others would look strangely disconnected if I tried to squeeze them into a traditional CV.

For a while, I thought I needed to decide which one was the real direction.
Eventually, I started asking a different question.

What if the career itself could be a system?

The career ladder is a powerful mental model

The ladder has shaped the way many of us understand professional progress.

There is something reassuring about it. Each step has a place. Progress is visible. Success has familiar markers: a higher title, more responsibility, more money, a larger team.

It also gives us a simple answer to one of the hardest career questions:

Where am I going?

Up.

Yet the labour market around that model is changing.

The OECD describes digitalization, the green transition and rising longevity as forces contributing to increasingly fluid, fragmented and diverse career paths. Workers are changing jobs, firms and even careers more often, while longer working lives make mid-career and later-career transitions increasingly relevant.1

Technology is accelerating another part of the change.

The World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs Report 2025, drawing on more than 1,000 employers representing over 14 million workers across 55 economies, identifies technological change, geoeconomic fragmentation, economic uncertainty, demographic shifts and the green transition among the major forces expected to reshape jobs and skills through 2030.2

AI is already changing tasks and skill requirements inside existing occupations. OECD research shows that many workers exposed to AI will not need specialized AI expertise, while the tasks they perform and the combination of skills required to perform them are changing.3

A career designed for this environment may need a different shape.

From sequence to system

This changed the way I started looking at my own career.

Instead of asking: What should my next job be?

I began looking at what I already had.

Experience.
Skills.
Knowledge accumulated in different contexts.
Relationships.
Interests that had never belonged neatly inside my job description.
Things I was learning.
Things I was building.
Problems I knew how to solve.
And possibilities that were appearing as these elements started connecting.

Suddenly, some of the apparent randomness disappeared.

My years in finance had taught me much more than finance. They had given me experience with international organisations, processes, systems, transformation, people, different markets and the messy reality behind how global companies actually operate.

My interest in HR connected to that experience. My work around cross-border employment connected again. Technology added another layer. So did my curiosity about how people might work and live differently in the future.

Viewed as job titles, these directions can look fragmented.

Viewed as a system of capabilities, experiences and interests, they start forming something else.

A professional ecosystem.

Your career contains more than your job history

We tend to underestimate what we already carry with us.

A CV encourages us to organize our professional lives chronologically:

Company → Role → Responsibilities → Next role

A system view asks different questions:

What can I do?
What do I understand?
What have I experienced?
What can I connect?
Where could those combinations become valuable?

The distinction becomes increasingly important in a labour market where learning continues across working life.

The ILO’s 2026 work on lifelong learning describes learning as extending beyond formal education across work and wider life. It connects lifelong learning with people’s ability to adapt to digital, green and demographic transformations and highlights unequal access to the training needed to navigate those changes.4

A portfolio behaves differently from a ladder.

You can add to it.

Combine elements.

Strengthen one area.

Let another become less important.

Transfer knowledge from one context into another.

Discover value in combinations that were never part of an original career plan.

And sometimes build a role around a combination that does not yet have a convenient job title.

A simple way to look at your career differently

I have started looking at a career system through five elements:

EXPERIENCE: What have you actually done, seen, solved or lived through?

CAPABILITIES: What can you do across different roles and contexts?

CURIOSITY: What keeps pulling your attention, including things outside your current profession?

CONNECTIONS: Which seemingly separate parts of your experience become more valuable when combined?

OPTIONS: What becomes possible because you have this particular combination?

That last question changes the exercise.

Instead of forcing everything toward one predetermined destination, you begin identifying several plausible directions.

Some may become jobs.
Some may become projects.
Some may become businesses.
Some may remain interests until the right context appears.
Some may lead somewhere you cannot name yet.

I am increasingly comfortable with that uncertainty, because optionality has value too.

Careers can have architecture

A system still needs direction. Collecting interests, skills and projects without one can easily become noise. Direction, however, can come from a set of questions.

What kind of problems do I want to work on?
What capabilities do I want to keep developing?
Where is the world creating new demand?
Which parts of my experience give me an unusual advantage?
What kind of life should my work make possible?

Those questions connect career decisions with something larger than the next role.

They connect work with identity, mobility, learning, technology and life design.

The ILO has explored labour-market transitions through a life-course perspective, looking at how work interacts with other spheres of life and recognizing people’s agency in choosing steps that align with their own values.5

I find that idea much closer to the reality I see around me.

And to my own.

Try mapping your system

Take a blank page.
Write your current job title in the corner rather than the centre.
Then create five areas:

Experience
Capabilities
Curiosity
Connections
Options

Fill them without worrying yet about whether something belongs on a CV.

Include previous jobs, side projects, industries you understand, things people regularly ask you for help with, subjects you keep returning to, environments you know, technologies you are learning and problems you enjoy solving.

Then look for combinations. Perhaps the most useful question is:
What becomes possible when I connect what I already have?

I still don’t know exactly where every part of my own system will lead.

I can see more possibilities than I could when I was trying to fit everything onto a single line and that may be one of the most useful career capabilities we can develop now: learning to see possibilities before they have an obvious name.

What else is possible?

What if meeting someone new didn’t require being good at networking?

Some people can walk into a room and talk to anyone. Others need a reason. A question. A shared interest. Or simply a little less pressure around the whole thing.

That question became HELLO.

A song about making the first move, finding one unexpected connection and seeing where it might lead.

Because sometimes a new path begins with something very small.

One connection away.

The Pathway

HELLO started with a question:

What could networking look like if we removed some of the performance from it?

That question became an experiment: a global community designed to make meeting people beyond our usual circles simpler and more natural.

The idea is deliberately simple:

JOIN
Step into the room.

↓

SAY HELLO
Introduce yourself.

↓

DISCOVER
Meet someone beyond your usual circle.

↓

CONNECT
Start a conversation. Make an introduction.

↓

BRING ONE
Bring one interesting connection with you.

One person meets another.
That person brings someone else.

A network begins to grow.

From idea to experiment

HELLO is also an experiment.

Can a network grow without turning into another follower count?

Can people meet professionally without performing “networking”?

Can one useful introduction create another, and another, until people who would otherwise never have met end up in the same conversation?

I don’t know yet.

That’s why I’m building it.

→ JOIN HELLO

Sound Profile

◉ Series: PATHWAYS
◐ Duration: 3:12
◇ Mood: Human · Hopeful · Connected · Expansive
◑ Best for: Connection · Opportunity · Belonging · Shared Journeys
♫ Style: Cinematic Electronic Pop · Ensemble Vocals

About PATHWAYS

PATHWAYS explores what happens when an idea moves beyond the page.

Some become experiments.
Some become projects.
Some become programs, communities or learning experiences.

And sometimes they become sound.

Ideas translated into action and music.

Continue with PATHWAYS

Listen elsewhere

Spotify · Apple Music · YouTube Music · Amazon Music · Tidal

Continue the pathway → join HELLO

HELLO continues beyond the soundtrack as a real-world experiment in meeting people beyond our usual circles.

One introduction.
One unexpected connection.
One possibility that wasn’t there before.

Join HELLO and see where one connection can lead.

JOIN HELLO →

✨Future ideas. Articles. Soundtracks.

Subscribe now

Some journeys begin long before the destination becomes visible.

A new idea.
A new path.
A new chapter waiting to unfold.

Wings of Tomorrow was created for those moments when possibility feels bigger than uncertainty.

A reminder that every meaningful change begins with a single step forward and sometimes, the future arrives long before we are ready to name it.

The Reflection

Possibility • Freedom • Courage • New Beginnings

Sound Profile

◉ Series: ECHO
◐ Duration: 2:49
◈ Mood: Hope • Freedom • Optimism
◍ Best for: Reflection • Walking • New Beginnings
♬ Style: Contemporary Choral Pop • Anthemic • Uplifting

About ECHO

ECHO is a song series inspired by the moments, emotions and experiences that stay with us.

Each track captures something felt, noticed or lived. A connection, a shift, a question, a moment that keeps echoing after it has passed.

Less explanation. More feeling.

Continue with ECHO

Listen elsewhere

Spotify · Apple Music · YouTube Music · Amazon Music · Tidal

✨Future ideas. Articles. Soundtracks.

Subscribe now

Break Free is an energetic electronic instrumental built for momentum, focus and forward movement.

Deep bass, crisp percussion and a driving rhythm create a steady sense of motion without pulling attention away from the work.

Made for the moments when you need to get started, push through resistance or keep moving once you’ve found your flow.

Fast enough to energize.
Structured enough to stay productive.

No lyrics. Just movement.

Sound Profile

◉ Series: WAVE
◐ Duration: 3:53
◈ Mood: Focus • Momentum • Flow
◍ Best for: Deep Work · Planning · Creative Work
♬ Style: Electronic • Deep Bass • Modern Club Influence

About WAVE

WAVE is a collection of instrumental soundtracks designed for focus, flow, deep work and creative thinking.

Each track creates space for concentration, reflection and building something meaningful.

No lyrics. No distractions. Just momentum.

Continue with WAVE

Listen elsewhere

Spotify · Apple Music · YouTube Music · Amazon Music · Tidal

✨Future ideas. Articles. Soundtracks.

Subscribe now

For years, digital nomadism had a recognizable visual language.

A laptop.
A beach.
A co-working space somewhere warm.

The underlying idea was simple: if work could travel through the internet, perhaps the worker could travel too.

But I think the more interesting question begins one step later.

What happens when we stop designing work around location and start designing the infrastructure that makes work possible?

That takes us somewhere very different.

Sometimes as far as the northern edge of Europe.

Infrastructure as the new level of freedom

Remote work separated certain kinds of work from the office.

Satellite connectivity, distributed energy systems, increasingly capable portable technology and new forms of small-scale architecture are beginning to separate some forms of living and working from traditional infrastructure as well.

That distinction matters.

Location independence asks: Where can I work?

Infrastructure independence asks: What does this place need so I can work from here?

Energy.
Connectivity.
Shelter.
Water.
A workable environment.

Once those components become more portable, distributed or self-contained, the map of possible workplaces changes.

This is already visible in experiments with off-grid living.

Finnish architect Pekka Littow’s Majamaja concept, for example, combines self-sustained green energy, rainwater collection, circular water treatment and compact living architecture. Its Helsinki archipelago retreat operates off-grid while its cabins still include a dining table that doubles as a work desk, running water, kitchen facilities and other basic infrastructure for temporary living and working.

It is a small example.

But it points towards a much bigger idea.

The workplace can become a system rather than a place.

The new remote-work stack

Think about a remote workplace as a stack.

Energy

Working somewhere only becomes possible when the devices, heating, lighting and communications infrastructure can operate reliably.

Distributed energy systems make increasingly self-contained environments possible.

Connectivity

Satellite internet has changed another part of the equation.

Connectivity can now reach locations where terrestrial broadband infrastructure would previously have made serious remote knowledge work difficult or impossible.

That doesn’t make every remote location a reliable workplace. Weather, coverage, latency, power supply and redundancy still matter.

But geography is becoming a different kind of constraint.

Environment

And then there is the component we discuss much less: attention.

A workplace is also an attentional environment.

Notifications, meetings, conversations, noise, visual stimulation and constant context switching all compete for a finite cognitive resource.

This makes the physical environment part of the infrastructure of knowledge work.

What if silence is infrastructure too?

This is where the Arctic cabin becomes more than an aesthetic idea.

Research into natural environments and cognition suggests that exposure to nature can have restorative effects on attention. A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis covering 80 studies found greater overall cognitive restoration following nature exposure than non-nature exposure, with the clearest effects appearing in working memory and attentional control. The researchers also caution that effects vary substantially between studies.

So the interesting idea isn’t:

nature makes everyone more productive.

It is subtler than that.

The environment changes the conditions under which attention operates.

For some kinds of work, fewer interruptions and longer periods of uninterrupted concentration may be more valuable than constant accessibility.

And that changes how we might think about workplace design.

From remote work to environment design

Remote work discussions usually revolve around a familiar question:

office or home?

But that may already be too narrow.

Once work becomes digitally portable, we can start asking different questions.

What environment helps this particular work happen?
When do I need collaboration?
When do I need isolation?
How much connectivity do I actually need?
Which parts of my infrastructure need redundancy?
What physical conditions help me think?

This turns remote work into something more interesting than a location policy.

It becomes environment design.

The new meaning of “nomad”

The first generation of digital nomadism was primarily about mobility.

Move somewhere else and take the work with you.

The next evolution may be less about constant movement.

It may be about choosing and designing environments intentionally.

A city for collaboration.
A home for stability.
A train for transition.
A cabin for deep work.
A different country for a different chapter of life.

The future of location-independent work may therefore have surprisingly little to do with being permanently nomadic.

It may simply give us a larger set of environments from which to build a working life.

Silence as technology

And this brings me back to the idea behind Silent Code.

Technology usually enters the future-of-work conversation as something we add.

Another platform.
Another AI tool.
Another communication layer.
Another device.

But sometimes the most valuable thing technology can give us is the ability to remove something.

Distance.
Dependency.
Noise.
Interruption.

The paradox is interesting:

the more technology allows us to work from anywhere, the more valuable the ability to choose where our attention goes may become.

Perhaps silence belongs in the technology stack too.

Not as an escape from work.

As infrastructure for thinking.

Sources & further reading

Majamaja
Off-grid architecture, energy, water systems and cabin concept
Majamaja official website

Nature exposure and cognitive restoration
Effects of nature exposure on cognitive restoration: A systematic review and meta-analysis
2025 · Journal of Environmental Psychology / ScienceDirect

Satellite connectivity
Starlink · official information on satellite internet and service availability

FROM ARTICLE TO SOUND

SIGNAL 001 · SILENT CODE

ARTICLE
Infrastructure independence · Remote work · Environmental design

↓

SOUND
Isolation · Focus · Cold · Continuity

About SIGNAL

Ideas become sound.

SIGNAL turns selected articles and written ideas into original soundtracks.

Articles translated into music.

Continue with SIGNAL

Listen elsewhere

Spotify · Apple Music · YouTube Music · Amazon Music · Tidal

✨Future ideas. Articles. Soundtracks.

Subscribe now